Why do some employees show with a negative age?
Overview
It's possible that Windows can interpret a date represented by only two digits as being in a different century. When the settings are not configured properly, it can display the employee as having a negative age on their record.
When an age has been entered correctly as two digits and Windows is configured correctly, it should display the correct age.
When the date is not configured correctly, it can cause an issue when attempting to apply a Pay run. It may also be an issue when using the Human Resources module.
Example of report error
-----------------------------------------------------------
ERROR LIST
-----------------------------------------------------------
18961 : An issue occurred while attempting to process a Single Touch Payroll lodgment for the current pay run
31801 : An error occurred while preparing Single Touch Payroll data
31802 : An error occurred while preparing Single Touch Payroll lodgment data for STP #xxxx
31902 : An error occurred while preparing Single Touch Payroll lodgment data
31870 : Required data for a record within a Single Touch Payroll lodgment was found to be invalid
31932 : The Date of birth for employee 'xxxx' (03/02/89) is after the current date.
How to fix
To fix this you need to adjust your Windows Date format for two digits.
Access Windows Control Panel
On your Windows PC, go to your Windows Control Panel. If you don't know how to access this, press Start > Search "Control Panel". Other ways to open it are available here. Navigate to the Clock and Region settings (Category view).
If your Control panel is sorted by Small or Large icons, navigate to the Region setting.
From the Region window select Additional settings.
The Customize Format window will open. Select the Date tab and check the Calendar section. Make sure that this is set to recognise the earliest date required as a two-digit date will be formatted to the correct year.
Check in Accentis Enterprise
In Accentis Enterprise, go to Payroll > Employees and edit an employee that was displaying incorrectly. It should now be showing the correct age.
Did you find this article helpful?
If this article is missing information, ambiguous, or didn’t give you clear instructions, let us know and we will make it better! Please email us and quote the KB# in the top left of this article to let us know why it didn’t help you out and we will point you in the direction of additional information.
Last edit 11/10/2019